Inside Xham - translated from German w/ comments
DickesLuder-1967 Posts
Inside Xhamster.
***************************
( What's in the net about our Xhamster !!! )
Journalists want to have found Xhamster owners
Xhamster is and remains home to numerous i*****l contents. But without knowing who is benefiting, you have not yet known who is responsible.
Xhamster is Germany's most popular porn platform. With so-called amateur recordings, the website offers, among other things, numerous videos that are not (no longer) to be found on other sites such as Pornhub for good reason. Because the clips do not always conceal the intention of the people shown to present the result to the public. In other words: A lot of content on Xhamster is i*****l.
Golem.de - IT news for professionals
Golem.de now read ad-free
Journalists want to have found Xhamster owners
Xhamster is and remains home to numerous i*****l contents. But without knowing who is benefiting, you have not yet known who is responsible.
Xhamster is Germany's most popular porn platform.
With so-called amateur recordings, the website offers, among other things, numerous videos that are not (no longer) to be found on other sites such as Pornhub for good reason. Because the clips do not always conceal the intention of the people shown to present the result to the public. In other words: A lot of content on Xhamster is i*****l.
Although the platform officially employs so-called deletion teams and even the host provider has already been asked to turn the tap off, nothing has happened so far. This is due on the one hand to the platform itself, which seems to be all too careless with critical content, and on the other hand to a lack of addressee for legal claims - because until now it was not known who the hamster belongs to.
Months of research by STRG_F (NDR) and Spiegel want to have found what has been successfully concealed for years. According to this, 90 percent of Xhamster belongs to a Russian-born Cypriot named Oleg Netepenko and 10 percent to a man named Dmitry Gusev.
However, they do not hold the shares directly in Xhamster, but in a company called Wisebits Ltd. based in Cyprus. This in turn controls the companies Hammy Media Ltd., TrafficStars Ltd., Technius Ltd. and Tecom Ltd .. The latter are officially part of an Online Media Entertainment Holding in the British Virgin Islands, but which are part of Wisebits Ltd. heard.
Retirees as company bosses
The network of companies makes it difficult to find the real owners, especially since straw men like a 63-year-old pensioner named Mardiros H. as the owner of, for example, Hammy Media Ltd. and refuse to provide any information in the event of queries. It was only after digging into web archives and land registry entries that the journalists finally came to Netepenko and Gusev. Interviews with employees of Wisebits Ltd. in Cyprus also confirmed the work of the journalists, even if most of them only knew the pseudonyms of the bosses, as Wisebits Ltd. - even according to their own social media profile - hardly addresses anyone by real name.
Finally found, the team confronted Oleg Netepenko with an extensive catalog of questions about Xhamster, the companies and the responsibility for the content on the porn platform. An "Oleg R." answered, but countered the email from the journalists with counter-questions. For example, he wanted to know the names of the journalists involved and what the real goal of this research was. And whether this is really the boss is also unclear. The request for an interview in front of the camera did not come from Wisebits Ltd. after.
The pressure on sites like Pornhub or Xhamster is growing steadily. Without sensible and responsible control, portals face very expensive lawsuits from victims and governments alike.
Inside Xhamster
rC3
Journalists have succeeded in being accepted into the deletion team of the porn website Xhamster. On the rC3, they report on the lax handling of i*****l content.
Two journalists did research on the Xhamster deletion team.
Actually, the two journalists Sebastian Meineck and Yannah Alfering just wanted to find out whether there was a system behind the increasing number of individual cases of non-consensual porn - i.e. recordings that are created or published without the consent of those concerned - on the Xhamster platform. But Xhamster didn't want to answer her questions. So they smuggled into the deletion team of the porn platform. The two journalists report on their experiences at the online hacker meeting rC3.
Xhamster is the most popular porn website in Germany. In addition to a paid support team, there is a voluntary deletion team, the Reviewers Club. The two journalists wanted to join this with a fake profile, which they had given the name Holger. But then it was time to wait (200 days) and create your own content. Because these are the prerequisites for becoming part of the Reviewer Club. The identity of the person is not checked.
Via social engineering in the Reviewers Club
After some back and forth - again and again more content was requested or the journalists not answered - they were actually accepted into the Reviewers Club and were given an insight into the content moderation of the platform. The task of the fewer than 130 volunteers, and thus also of Holger, was to look at pictures and rate them using various buttons.
The content can be rejected for content with a****ls using the "Minors", "Faecal" or "Zoo" buttons. In addition, there are only general categories for rejection. There is also the option of skipping the content, activating it or moving it to a certain category such as "Men".
Lax rules for moderation
But how does a moderator decide which content is okay and which is not? The platform provides a short, 2,800 character long guide with sample images - for comparison: This article is roughly twice as long.
The guide explains in great detail the conditions under which pictures should be moved to the category of men, while it deals with the area of minors very briefly, said Alfering. If a person is likely to be a minor, the content should be deleted, it says there. Much more tips than paying attention to piercings, tattoos and stretch marks would not be given.
But pornographic content from minors is simply i ***** l. With their fake profile Holger, the two journalists asked what to do if they were unsure. The admin advised just skipping the images, then "someone else will review". But the others could judge it just as badly as Holger, emphasizes Meineck.
Extinguish? Only with 100 percent certainty!
The most important rule of the manual is particularly spicy: "Do not delete any content if you are not 100 percent sure." This means that even with the slightest doubt that a picture was intentionally posted, it should not be moderated. In any case, the pictures would only be moderated when they are already online and then deleted afterwards.
There are no rules, assistance or a button for recordings that have been published or even secretly recorded without the consent of those concerned. On the contrary, if the moderators have no proof that it was published without consent, should it stay online - and when do you have proof of this?
For precisely such voyeuristic recordings, the porn platforms have received massive criticism in recent years, especially Xhamster. In contrast to the lax review of the content, the people whose content was published on Xhamster without consent, however, are checked much more precisely and more slowly.
Something is finally happening in 2020
In the last few weeks there has finally been movement in the industry, say the journalists. The payment service providers Mastercard and Visa have discontinued their business relationships with Pornhub after criticism. Pornhub responded and only allows content from verified accounts. All content from anonymous or unchecked accounts will be deleted.
Xhamster reacted similarly, but only with the uploaded images, explain the two journalists. Xhamster also removed the "Voyeur" category from the homepage and renamed the Teen category to: Teen 18+. This could be attributed partly to her reporting and partly to the Sisea (Stop Internet Sexual Exploitation Act) bill in the USA, which requires that porn actresses are required to provide identification.
This would tackle and solve the problem with non-consensual porn on the platforms, but the law also has massive disadvantages for sex workers, emphasize the journalists. For example, if they need to protect their identity. Only at the beginning of the year was a massive data leak discovered in which a porn company had left extensive contract data, including copies of the actors' IDs, unprotected online.
This would tackle and solve the problem with non-consensual porn on the platforms, but the law also has massive disadvantages for sex workers, emphasize the journalists. For example, if they need to protect their identity. Only at the beginning of the year was a massive data leak discovered in which a porn company had left extensive contract data, including copies of the actors' IDs, unprotected online.
Attackers are said to have stolen data on around 380,000 accounts on the Xhamster porn site, as Motherboard reports, citing Leaksbase.pw. The information captured is currently to be offered for sale. The data record contains user names, e-mail addresses and inadequately secured passwords. The operator of the website contradicts this representation. Rather, it is a fake leak.
Xhamster claims that it has around 12 million users. The site can be used free of charge and without registration, so an account is optional. It is unclear at what point in time the information on the 380,000 affected accounts was copied or whether it was randomly collected data.
Motherboard verified the record
Motherboard still assumes that the data offered for sale is real. An attempt was made to register new accounts with 50 e-mail addresses selected at random from the data set. They would have received the error message "This email address already existed" from the system. The portal proceeded similarly with the user names and also received an error message. Xhamster, on the other hand, says that the data cannot be assigned to any user of the website.
The data set also contains passwords which, according to Xhamster, are "properly encrypted". Motherboard, on the other hand, writes that the passwords are only hashed with the MD5 algorithm, which is considered insecure. A spokesman for the website now contradicts this representation, too, but does not provide any information on the method used.
Brazzers.com has also been attacked in the past. A vulnerability in a vBulletin forum was exploited there and information about 800,000 accounts was stolen.
The operator of the website speaks of a "fake leak" in a current statement.
Inside Xhamster.
***************************
( What's in the net about our Xhamster !!! )
Journalists want to have found Xhamster owners
Xhamster is and remains home to numerous i*****l contents. But without knowing who is benefiting, you have not yet known who is responsible.
Xhamster is Germany's most popular porn platform. With so-called amateur recordings, the website offers, among other things, numerous videos that are not (no longer) to be found on other sites such as Pornhub for good reason. Because the clips do not always conceal the intention of the people shown to present the result to the public. In other words: A lot of content on Xhamster is i*****l.
Golem.de - IT news for professionals
Golem.de now read ad-free
Journalists want to have found Xhamster owners
Xhamster is and remains home to numerous i*****l contents. But without knowing who is benefiting, you have not yet known who is responsible.
Xhamster is Germany's most popular porn platform.
With so-called amateur recordings, the website offers, among other things, numerous videos that are not (no longer) to be found on other sites such as Pornhub for good reason. Because the clips do not always conceal the intention of the people shown to present the result to the public. In other words: A lot of content on Xhamster is i*****l.
Although the platform officially employs so-called deletion teams and even the host provider has already been asked to turn the tap off, nothing has happened so far. This is due on the one hand to the platform itself, which seems to be all too careless with critical content, and on the other hand to a lack of addressee for legal claims - because until now it was not known who the hamster belongs to.
Months of research by STRG_F (NDR) and Spiegel want to have found what has been successfully concealed for years. According to this, 90 percent of Xhamster belongs to a Russian-born Cypriot named Oleg Netepenko and 10 percent to a man named Dmitry Gusev.
However, they do not hold the shares directly in Xhamster, but in a company called Wisebits Ltd. based in Cyprus. This in turn controls the companies Hammy Media Ltd., TrafficStars Ltd., Technius Ltd. and Tecom Ltd .. The latter are officially part of an Online Media Entertainment Holding in the British Virgin Islands, but which are part of Wisebits Ltd. heard.
Retirees as company bosses
The network of companies makes it difficult to find the real owners, especially since straw men like a 63-year-old pensioner named Mardiros H. as the owner of, for example, Hammy Media Ltd. and refuse to provide any information in the event of queries. It was only after digging into web archives and land registry entries that the journalists finally came to Netepenko and Gusev. Interviews with employees of Wisebits Ltd. in Cyprus also confirmed the work of the journalists, even if most of them only knew the pseudonyms of the bosses, as Wisebits Ltd. - even according to their own social media profile - hardly addresses anyone by real name.
Finally found, the team confronted Oleg Netepenko with an extensive catalog of questions about Xhamster, the companies and the responsibility for the content on the porn platform. An "Oleg R." answered, but countered the email from the journalists with counter-questions. For example, he wanted to know the names of the journalists involved and what the real goal of this research was. And whether this is really the boss is also unclear. The request for an interview in front of the camera did not come from Wisebits Ltd. after.
The pressure on sites like Pornhub or Xhamster is growing steadily. Without sensible and responsible control, portals face very expensive lawsuits from victims and governments alike.
Inside Xhamster
rC3
Journalists have succeeded in being accepted into the deletion team of the porn website Xhamster. On the rC3, they report on the lax handling of i*****l content.
Two journalists did research on the Xhamster deletion team.
Actually, the two journalists Sebastian Meineck and Yannah Alfering just wanted to find out whether there was a system behind the increasing number of individual cases of non-consensual porn - i.e. recordings that are created or published without the consent of those concerned - on the Xhamster platform. But Xhamster didn't want to answer her questions. So they smuggled into the deletion team of the porn platform. The two journalists report on their experiences at the online hacker meeting rC3.
Xhamster is the most popular porn website in Germany. In addition to a paid support team, there is a voluntary deletion team, the Reviewers Club. The two journalists wanted to join this with a fake profile, which they had given the name Holger. But then it was time to wait (200 days) and create your own content. Because these are the prerequisites for becoming part of the Reviewer Club. The identity of the person is not checked.
Via social engineering in the Reviewers Club
After some back and forth - again and again more content was requested or the journalists not answered - they were actually accepted into the Reviewers Club and were given an insight into the content moderation of the platform. The task of the fewer than 130 volunteers, and thus also of Holger, was to look at pictures and rate them using various buttons.
The content can be rejected for content with a****ls using the "Minors", "Faecal" or "Zoo" buttons. In addition, there are only general categories for rejection. There is also the option of skipping the content, activating it or moving it to a certain category such as "Men".
Lax rules for moderation
But how does a moderator decide which content is okay and which is not? The platform provides a short, 2,800 character long guide with sample images - for comparison: This article is roughly twice as long.
The guide explains in great detail the conditions under which pictures should be moved to the category of men, while it deals with the area of minors very briefly, said Alfering. If a person is likely to be a minor, the content should be deleted, it says there. Much more tips than paying attention to piercings, tattoos and stretch marks would not be given.
But pornographic content from minors is simply i ***** l. With their fake profile Holger, the two journalists asked what to do if they were unsure. The admin advised just skipping the images, then "someone else will review". But the others could judge it just as badly as Holger, emphasizes Meineck.
Extinguish? Only with 100 percent certainty!
The most important rule of the manual is particularly spicy: "Do not delete any content if you are not 100 percent sure." This means that even with the slightest doubt that a picture was intentionally posted, it should not be moderated. In any case, the pictures would only be moderated when they are already online and then deleted afterwards.
There are no rules, assistance or a button for recordings that have been published or even secretly recorded without the consent of those concerned. On the contrary, if the moderators have no proof that it was published without consent, should it stay online - and when do you have proof of this?
For precisely such voyeuristic recordings, the porn platforms have received massive criticism in recent years, especially Xhamster. In contrast to the lax review of the content, the people whose content was published on Xhamster without consent, however, are checked much more precisely and more slowly.
Something is finally happening in 2020
In the last few weeks there has finally been movement in the industry, say the journalists. The payment service providers Mastercard and Visa have discontinued their business relationships with Pornhub after criticism. Pornhub responded and only allows content from verified accounts. All content from anonymous or unchecked accounts will be deleted.
Xhamster reacted similarly, but only with the uploaded images, explain the two journalists. Xhamster also removed the "Voyeur" category from the homepage and renamed the Teen category to: Teen 18+. This could be attributed partly to her reporting and partly to the Sisea (Stop Internet Sexual Exploitation Act) bill in the USA, which requires that porn actresses are required to provide identification.
This would tackle and solve the problem with non-consensual porn on the platforms, but the law also has massive disadvantages for sex workers, emphasize the journalists. For example, if they need to protect their identity. Only at the beginning of the year was a massive data leak discovered in which a porn company had left extensive contract data, including copies of the actors' IDs, unprotected online.
This would tackle and solve the problem with non-consensual porn on the platforms, but the law also has massive disadvantages for sex workers, emphasize the journalists. For example, if they need to protect their identity. Only at the beginning of the year was a massive data leak discovered in which a porn company had left extensive contract data, including copies of the actors' IDs, unprotected online.
Attackers are said to have stolen data on around 380,000 accounts on the Xhamster porn site, as Motherboard reports, citing Leaksbase.pw. The information captured is currently to be offered for sale. The data record contains user names, e-mail addresses and inadequately secured passwords. The operator of the website contradicts this representation. Rather, it is a fake leak.
Xhamster claims that it has around 12 million users. The site can be used free of charge and without registration, so an account is optional. It is unclear at what point in time the information on the 380,000 affected accounts was copied or whether it was randomly collected data.
Motherboard verified the record
Motherboard still assumes that the data offered for sale is real. An attempt was made to register new accounts with 50 e-mail addresses selected at random from the data set. They would have received the error message "This email address already existed" from the system. The portal proceeded similarly with the user names and also received an error message. Xhamster, on the other hand, says that the data cannot be assigned to any user of the website.
The data set also contains passwords which, according to Xhamster, are "properly encrypted". Motherboard, on the other hand, writes that the passwords are only hashed with the MD5 algorithm, which is considered insecure. A spokesman for the website now contradicts this representation, too, but does not provide any information on the method used.
Brazzers.com has also been attacked in the past. A vulnerability in a vBulletin forum was exploited there and information about 800,000 accounts was stolen.
The operator of the website speaks of a "fake leak" in a current statement.
3 years ago
