Controversial Opinions
I'm totally going to sound big-headed here (shock horror! lol) but it seems anytime I write an opinion piece on here, I'm always met with a lot of agreement to my views. Maybe it's just that porn lovers like you and I have very sensible (if utterly filthy) brains in our heads :P lol or maybe we're all just crazy, who knows lol ...Personally, I think it's the world that is crazy, and we're the last of the sane people left in it ;)
But anyway, the views of mine I'm going to share with you in this following post, are ones where I'm always in the minority whenever I express them out loud to the big open wide world. Fair warning, after reading this post you're either going to love me even more, or you're going to outright hate me. You have be warned lol
Enjoy! :D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) The Beatles are, by far, the most overrated pop act ever!
...They really aren't all that good either. They are just a cookie-cutter pop boyband of the '60s, not too dissimilar to modern day boyband equivalents like One Direction, 5 Seconds of Summer, The Wanted, etc, etc. I suppose they get a little point in their favour for actually being able to play their instruments (something modern day boybands really struggle with), but the music they made with those instruments is really nothing special at all. Just generic, bland, pop-of-the-day music. There were thousands of other bands just like them in the '60s, churning out the exact same sort of cookie-cutter boring music as they were, sung in the same sort of vocal styling/rhythm. There was nothing special, unique or different about them at all. The only reason, I think, that they became so famous is because one of those samey bands had to fill the role of "most famous out of the lot", and they were randomly selected by the teenagers of the day just because someone had to be selected to be the most famous boyband.
If they weren't the ones who were chosen out of the thousands of other identical bands of the day to fill that role, it would have just been another one of those samey bands picked to be the "icons of the teenage '60s".
Personally, had I been around at that time of history, I would have plumbed for Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich to be the best pop band of the '60s, because they had way greater better pop songs that actually sounded somewhat unique and different from everyone else around at the time, and they had many more chart-topping hits in the '60s than those Liverpudlians ever had o_o
As for the individuals of the group, well, John Lennon was a dirtbag, hypocrite, cunt of a man with a really whiny nasally singing voice, but at least he was able to write a couple good songs post-Beatles. Paul McCartney, fair play to him, comes across like a guy who deep down is aware of just how lucky he is/was to have the successful career he did and just seems like he has a lot of fun with music (as evidenced by his very silly obviously-in-on-the-joke songs - "Mull of Kintyre", "We All Stand Together", etc). George Harrison tried his best to distance himself from The Beatles (I guess he was aware of how bland and boring their sound really was), and branched out to embrace other more deeper and meaningful genres of music to varying degrees of success. And Ringo Starr is... Well, Ringo Starr is Ringo Starr, need I say any more about him than that? :P lol
So yes, in short, The Beatles were a totally average, nothing special at all, cookie-cutter pop boyband of the '60s, overrated to the nth degree by bandwagon-jumpers :P
2) There are some situations in life where it's totally fine for a man to hit a woman
Wow, from talking about to John Lennon, to talking about a man hitting a woman, who'd have ever thought? :P hahaha
No but seriously, I don't for one second advocate or condone men beating women. Womenbeaters have a very special place for them to rot in hell, and if I had it my way, disgusting womenbeaters would be brutally and slowly sent to hell by being tortured to death in the most horrific and agonising of ways a warped mind like mine can think of :) (and the same goes for vile women who thinks it's fine for them to beat their partners)
Of course, it would be lovely if we could live in a world where people never use violence against other people (men on men, men on women, women on men, and women on women). But sadly, we don't live in that non-violent world. And I've always firmly believed in a, "If someone hits you, you hit them back", mentality towards physical violence.
So with that said, if a woman punched a man, that man is well within his right to punch her back. Just like if a man punches a woman, that woman is well within her right to punch him back. Basically, what I'm saying is, regardless of whoever you are, if someone hits you, you have every right to defend yourself in whatever physical way is necessary to defend/protect yourself and end the threat, including hitting them back.
If I went up to a random guy on the street and suddenly thwacked him on the nose with my fist, I would have no right to complain if he then punched me back. He would be totally justified in punching me, because I was the aggressor who suddenly attacked him and forced him into a defensive position. I'd have been the one in the wrong for having started the assault in the first place. Vice versa, if I was suddenly punched by a guy while out on the street, I would be totally justified in punching him back, because he was the aggressor who suddenly forced me into a defensive position. He'd be the one in the wrong for having started the assault in the first place.
That's why whenever I see women who randomly start attacking guys when they're drunk or for whatever reason they decide to just start a physical assault on a guy, I never think less of the guy if he fights back and knocks her flat on her arse. You get what you deserve in life. No matter the situation, if you punch someone, they have every right to punch you back.
Regardless of whether you're a man or a woman (or something else) reading this, just please don't ever hit someone unless it's to defend yourself from them. If everybody in the world could agree to never be the first to use violence on others, this world would quickly become a much better more peaceful place :)
3) The Far-Left is way more dangerous, deranged, deadly, evil and stubborn, than the Far-Right
Please don't take this statement to think I support far-right ideals - I don't. Far-right wingers in the world are really stupid idiots who are fundamentally wrong on a LOT of sociopolitical issues, and usually are pretty nasty hateful people.
With that said, far-left wingers are WAAAAYYY worst than those idiots! lol
Seriously, at least far-right wingers have the excuse of being mind-numbingly ignorant to excuse themselves for their hateful beliefs, what is the far-left wing's excuse for their dangerous mentally-disturbing toxic beliefs? O_o
Its a lot easier and simpler to talk to and educate the dumb apes who are far-right minded and turn them back into something resembling a thoughtful considerate human being, than it is to educate the deranged mental cuckoo-headed evil far-left wingers of the world.
If the far-left were to take full control of the world, everybody in it would quickly find themselves under a huge heavy jackboot, and being censored beyond all belief. All freedoms, rights and privileges you enjoy right now as a human being would be swept away like sand in the wind, as you're forced against your will to subscribe to their deranged mentality and live the way they tell you to live. Failure to comply will result in a punishment far worse than anything the likes of the Nazis or whatever disgusting far-right fascist regime ever did to punish those they deemed less than them.
And this isn't some fanciful, fear-mongering, baseless accusation of mine. You can quickly find real world proof of these claims simply by looking towards countries with far-left regimes in place, like for example; China, North Korea, The Soviet Union during its whole existence and the countries it had engulfed under its iron curtain, Cambodia (1976 - 1979), Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, the list goes on.
That's not to say life for people who had lived under far-right fascist regimes was a cakewalk. It wasn't. But if you compare all the deaths/genocides directly caused by every far-right regime who ever had power, with all the deaths/genocides directly caused by far-left regimes in power, you'd find that the number of people directly killed because of the far-left regime is astronomically higher than that of the far-right.
4) Metal Gear is just a big ol' series of terribly-made games
Onto a more lighter, controversial opinion of mine from those last entries :P
But yeah, every game in the Metal Gear series are really bad videogames. The only reason anyone enjoys them/finds enjoyment in them, is because they are just so OTT stupid, with ultra-campy writing that they become "so bad it's good" kind of games. Hideo Kojima is not some video-gaming Jesus Christ. He just farts out utter campy stupidness in his games, and the only reason he's highly-regarded by gamers is because he's a real stickler for the details in his absurd videogames. He does put a lot of detail in his games (to an absurd, obsessive fault), but let's be honest with ourselves here, all of that intricate detail counts for nothing if it all adds up to a simple collage picture of a turd :)
Now I'm not saying I didn't have some fun back in the day playing Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, and Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater. But it wasn't because they were "good" games. They really aren't good games at all. In fact, they are outright crap. The gameplay in them is pretty shit and very basic, with a very clunky interface and nonsensical button-mapping. But they were so stupid, with a ton of silly committed obsessive detail thrown in them that it couldn't help but to bring a stupid grin to my face when I embraced the stupidness of it all and laughed along with the entire joke of it all. They just give you funny silly stuff to enjoy, and enjoy them I did :)
Every other game in the series since then, though, have just gotten worse and worse with each new entry.
Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain, is one of the most mind-numbing games I've ever played. By god, is it BORING.
The only entertainment I ever got from it, was the opening scene/sequence where you're laying in the hospital bed, with the doctor and the nurse telling you about the plane crash you had and that you've been in acoma for X-amount of time, and how they deliver the news to you in the worst possible way they could that you had to have your arm amputated. And that was all just because of the extremely OTT, campy, super-melodramatic, highly-charged, nonsensical, wooden, scene-chewing acting. It's like the most silliest, scene-chewingest, Am-Dram play with everyone playing a version of William Shatner. It is the most funniest, hilarious scene/sequence in any video game, ever! And I highly recommend anyone to watch that whole scene/sequence as a cure for depression, it's THAT fucking funny :D
But after that opening scene ends and the game starts proper, it just takes a massive downhill turn. The acting/writing remains stupid, but not "HA HA HA! xD" stupid, just "Gee, that's depressing :/" stupid.
It's SO BORING! There's no reason to carry on playing the game beyond that first scene. The core gameplay loop of it has the staying power of a 13 year old virgin getting a hand-job off of Becky with the big tits behind the school sheds. It doesn't last at all...
There's nothing fun in the game. I've been told (and shown) of the funny elements found in it, like air-lifting sheep via a skyhook (which is admittedly very funny to watch on Youtube), but you have to progress a number of hours into the game to get to unlocking that ability. A single minute in the boring game drags on for what feels like eternity, so there's no way in hell I was ever going to make it that far into the boring game just for that little humorous payoff.
And that's to say nothing of the terrible interface and button-layout the game uses for its control scheme. My god, it is a total fucking mess!
Say what you want about the Japs (they are a wonderful people, with an awesome culture I'd love to learn more about and visit someday), but THEY CAN NOT PROPERLY BUTTON-MAP A VIDEOGAME TO SAVE THEIR LIVES!!! x_x
Ugh, it's just a hot garbage fire of a game, that doesn't deserve any of the praise it gets from bandwagon-jumping "gamers", who wouldn't know a good fun game if it jumped up and sucked their cock/clit to a mindshattering orgasm.
"Fans" of the Metal Gear series cry that the series turned to shit when Hideo Kojima left, and Konami shat out that godawful Metal Gear Survive in his absence. But what they fail to realise is that Metal Gear has always been utter shit from the start :P it's just that it used to be "so bad it's good" shit.
The last few games in the series has only been "So shit, it's shit", but it seems fanboyism goes a looong way in painting pretty pictures on the wall with lumps of turds... >_>
Thank you for reading! :)
Please, do tell me what you thought of these opinions, and feel free to share some of your own, in the comments below :)
But anyway, the views of mine I'm going to share with you in this following post, are ones where I'm always in the minority whenever I express them out loud to the big open wide world. Fair warning, after reading this post you're either going to love me even more, or you're going to outright hate me. You have be warned lol
Enjoy! :D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) The Beatles are, by far, the most overrated pop act ever!
...They really aren't all that good either. They are just a cookie-cutter pop boyband of the '60s, not too dissimilar to modern day boyband equivalents like One Direction, 5 Seconds of Summer, The Wanted, etc, etc. I suppose they get a little point in their favour for actually being able to play their instruments (something modern day boybands really struggle with), but the music they made with those instruments is really nothing special at all. Just generic, bland, pop-of-the-day music. There were thousands of other bands just like them in the '60s, churning out the exact same sort of cookie-cutter boring music as they were, sung in the same sort of vocal styling/rhythm. There was nothing special, unique or different about them at all. The only reason, I think, that they became so famous is because one of those samey bands had to fill the role of "most famous out of the lot", and they were randomly selected by the teenagers of the day just because someone had to be selected to be the most famous boyband.
If they weren't the ones who were chosen out of the thousands of other identical bands of the day to fill that role, it would have just been another one of those samey bands picked to be the "icons of the teenage '60s".
Personally, had I been around at that time of history, I would have plumbed for Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich to be the best pop band of the '60s, because they had way greater better pop songs that actually sounded somewhat unique and different from everyone else around at the time, and they had many more chart-topping hits in the '60s than those Liverpudlians ever had o_o
As for the individuals of the group, well, John Lennon was a dirtbag, hypocrite, cunt of a man with a really whiny nasally singing voice, but at least he was able to write a couple good songs post-Beatles. Paul McCartney, fair play to him, comes across like a guy who deep down is aware of just how lucky he is/was to have the successful career he did and just seems like he has a lot of fun with music (as evidenced by his very silly obviously-in-on-the-joke songs - "Mull of Kintyre", "We All Stand Together", etc). George Harrison tried his best to distance himself from The Beatles (I guess he was aware of how bland and boring their sound really was), and branched out to embrace other more deeper and meaningful genres of music to varying degrees of success. And Ringo Starr is... Well, Ringo Starr is Ringo Starr, need I say any more about him than that? :P lol
So yes, in short, The Beatles were a totally average, nothing special at all, cookie-cutter pop boyband of the '60s, overrated to the nth degree by bandwagon-jumpers :P
2) There are some situations in life where it's totally fine for a man to hit a woman
Wow, from talking about to John Lennon, to talking about a man hitting a woman, who'd have ever thought? :P hahaha
No but seriously, I don't for one second advocate or condone men beating women. Womenbeaters have a very special place for them to rot in hell, and if I had it my way, disgusting womenbeaters would be brutally and slowly sent to hell by being tortured to death in the most horrific and agonising of ways a warped mind like mine can think of :) (and the same goes for vile women who thinks it's fine for them to beat their partners)
Of course, it would be lovely if we could live in a world where people never use v
So with that said, if a woman punched a man, that man is well within his right to punch her back. Just like if a man punches a woman, that woman is well within her right to punch him back. Basically, what I'm saying is, regardless of whoever you are, if someone hits you, you have every right to defend yourself in whatever physical way is necessary to defend/protect yourself and end the threat, including hitting them back.
If I went up to a random guy on the street and suddenly thwacked him on the nose with my fist, I would have no right to complain if he then punched me back. He would be totally justified in punching me, because I was the aggressor who suddenly attacked him and forced him into a defensive position. I'd have been the one in the wrong for having started the assault in the first place. Vice versa, if I was suddenly punched by a guy while out on the street, I would be totally justified in punching him back, because he was the aggressor who suddenly forced me into a defensive position. He'd be the one in the wrong for having started the assault in the first place.
That's why whenever I see women who randomly start attacking guys when they're drunk or for whatever reason they decide to just start a physical assault on a guy, I never think less of the guy if he fights back and knocks her flat on her arse. You get what you deserve in life. No matter the situation, if you punch someone, they have every right to punch you back.
Regardless of whether you're a man or a woman (or something else) reading this, just please don't ever hit someone unless it's to defend yourself from them. If everybody in the world could agree to never be the first to use v
3) The Far-Left is way more dangerous, deranged, deadly, evil and stubborn, than the Far-Right
Please don't take this statement to think I support far-right ideals - I don't. Far-right wingers in the world are really stupid idiots who are fundamentally wrong on a LOT of sociopolitical issues, and usually are pretty nasty hateful people.
With that said, far-left wingers are WAAAAYYY worst than those idiots! lol
Seriously, at least far-right wingers have the excuse of being mind-numbingly ignorant to excuse themselves for their hateful beliefs, what is the far-left wing's excuse for their dangerous mentally-disturbing toxic beliefs? O_o
Its a lot easier and simpler to talk to and educate the dumb apes who are far-right minded and turn them back into something resembling a thoughtful considerate human being, than it is to educate the deranged mental cuckoo-headed evil far-left wingers of the world.
If the far-left were to take full control of the world, everybody in it would quickly find themselves under a huge heavy jackboot, and being censored beyond all belief. All freedoms, rights and privileges you enjoy right now as a human being would be swept away like sand in the wind, as you're forced against your will to subscribe to their deranged mentality and live the way they tell you to live. Failure to comply will result in a punishment far worse than anything the likes of the Nazis or whatever disgusting far-right fascist regime ever did to punish those they deemed less than them.
And this isn't some fanciful, fear-mongering, baseless accusation of mine. You can quickly find real world proof of these claims simply by looking towards countries with far-left regimes in place, like for example; China, North Korea, The Soviet Union during its whole existence and the countries it had engulfed under its iron curtain, Cambodia (1976 - 1979), Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, the list goes on.
That's not to say life for people who had lived under far-right fascist regimes was a cakewalk. It wasn't. But if you compare all the deaths/genocides directly caused by every far-right regime who ever had power, with all the deaths/genocides directly caused by far-left regimes in power, you'd find that the number of people directly killed because of the far-left regime is astronomically higher than that of the far-right.
4) Metal Gear is just a big ol' series of terribly-made games
Onto a more lighter, controversial opinion of mine from those last entries :P
But yeah, every game in the Metal Gear series are really bad videogames. The only reason anyone enjoys them/finds enjoyment in them, is because they are just so OTT stupid, with ultra-campy writing that they become "so bad it's good" kind of games. Hideo Kojima is not some video-gaming Jesus Christ. He just farts out utter campy stupidness in his games, and the only reason he's highly-regarded by gamers is because he's a real stickler for the details in his absurd videogames. He does put a lot of detail in his games (to an absurd, obsessive fault), but let's be honest with ourselves here, all of that intricate detail counts for nothing if it all adds up to a simple collage picture of a turd :)
Now I'm not saying I didn't have some fun back in the day playing Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, and Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater. But it wasn't because they were "good" games. They really aren't good games at all. In fact, they are outright crap. The gameplay in them is pretty shit and very basic, with a very clunky interface and nonsensical button-mapping. But they were so stupid, with a ton of silly committed obsessive detail thrown in them that it couldn't help but to bring a stupid grin to my face when I embraced the stupidness of it all and laughed along with the entire joke of it all. They just give you funny silly stuff to enjoy, and enjoy them I did :)
Every other game in the series since then, though, have just gotten worse and worse with each new entry.
Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain, is one of the most mind-numbing games I've ever played. By god, is it BORING.
The only entertainment I ever got from it, was the opening scene/sequence where you're laying in the hospital bed, with the doctor and the nurse telling you about the plane crash you had and that you've been in a
But after that opening scene ends and the game starts proper, it just takes a massive downhill turn. The acting/writing remains stupid, but not "HA HA HA! xD" stupid, just "Gee, that's depressing :/" stupid.
It's SO BORING! There's no reason to carry on playing the game beyond that first scene. The core gameplay loop of it has the staying power of a 13 year old virgin getting a hand-job off of Becky with the big tits behind the school sheds. It doesn't last at all...
There's nothing fun in the game. I've been told (and shown) of the funny elements found in it, like air-lifting sheep via a skyhook (which is admittedly very funny to watch on Youtube), but you have to progress a number of hours into the game to get to unlocking that ability. A single minute in the boring game drags on for what feels like eternity, so there's no way in hell I was ever going to make it that far into the boring game just for that little humorous payoff.
And that's to say nothing of the terrible interface and button-layout the game uses for its control scheme. My god, it is a total fucking mess!
Say what you want about the Japs (they are a wonderful people, with an awesome culture I'd love to learn more about and visit someday), but THEY CAN NOT PROPERLY BUTTON-MAP A VIDEOGAME TO SAVE THEIR LIVES!!! x_x
Ugh, it's just a hot garbage fire of a game, that doesn't deserve any of the praise it gets from bandwagon-jumping "gamers", who wouldn't know a good fun game if it jumped up and sucked their cock/clit to a mindshattering orgasm.
"Fans" of the Metal Gear series cry that the series turned to shit when Hideo Kojima left, and Konami shat out that godawful Metal Gear Survive in his absence. But what they fail to realise is that Metal Gear has always been utter shit from the start :P it's just that it used to be "so bad it's good" shit.
The last few games in the series has only been "So shit, it's shit", but it seems fanboyism goes a looong way in painting pretty pictures on the wall with lumps of turds... >_>
Thank you for reading! :)
Please, do tell me what you thought of these opinions, and feel free to share some of your own, in the comments below :)
5 years ago
